The issue of judicial discretion (the discretion the judge has when ruling on cases), especially on issues in which the law may be vague and there are no clear precedent cases for the judge to rely upon. Discuss the opposing views taken on this issue of judicial discretion by legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin versus the legal philosophers known as "American Legal Realists" (ALRs).

Identify the side you would align with (Dworkin or the ALRs) and set forth your justification for choosing this side.