The issues are:

1. Whether, in the circumstances, the principle "caveat emptor" applies or whether it is ousted by fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of the defendant;

2. Whether the description of the truck as a 1992 Dodge Dakota with approximately 58,000 kilometres was, in itself, a misrepresentation that induced the plaintiffs into believing the factory warranty would be in place; and

3. What damages result in the event the plaintiffs are successful on either ground?