1. The judgment in the final appeals decision of the O'Bannon vs. NCAA case ruled

	a.	that colleges could provide up to $5,000 per year for name, image and likeness rights to college athletes.
	b.	that the NCAA's rules regarding amateurism violated anti-trust law.
	c.	that the NCAA's rules regarding amateurism did not violate anti-trust laws.
	d.	that colleges could compensate their athletes over and above the full cost of attending the school within reason.