The laboratory experiment is traditionally considered the "gold standard" in psychology research. This is because only laboratory experiments can clearly separate cause from effect and therefore establish causality. Because of its ability to determine cause-and-effect relationships, the laboratory experiment is traditionally considered the method of choice for psychological science. One downside, however, is that as it carefully controls conditions and their effects, it can yield findings that are out of touch with reality and have limited use when trying to understand real-world behavior.Do you think laboratory experiments tell us about the real world?

Please provide sources used, thank you