'The law on Frustration is confused and needs reform. There are too many 'ways out' of a contract and the courts should not allow these 'ways out' to void a perfectly legally binding contract even though there are certain limits to a claim for frustration.

Discuss the validity of the statement, explaining the different ways in which a contract may be void for frustration, but also illustrating the limits to such a claim.

*Please provide atleast 3 cases and 2 acts.*