The living room floor at Ronald Coases house is common property. His daughter, Joan, really likes to drop clothing items on the living room floor; Ronald hates this form of littering. If Joan is left to do as she wishes, she will drop 10 items of clothing per week. The table below indicates Ronalds total willingness-to-pay (WTP) to stop this littering (or, alternatively, his willingness-to-accept (WTA) to allow littering to go on). It also shows Joans total WTA to stop her from dropping clothes (or alternatively, her WTP to be allowed to continue with the practice).

Clothes Dropping Reduced (Items/ week)	Ronalds Total WTP for clean-up ($ / week)	Joans Total WTA for clean-up ($ / week)	Ronalds Marginal WTP ($/ item/ week)	Joans Marginal WTA ($/ item/ week)
0	$0.00	$0.00	-	-
1	$1.00	$0.02
2	$1.80	$0.08
3	$2.50	$0.15
4	$3.00	$0.25
5	$3.40	$0.40
6	$3.70	$0.70
7	$3.90	$1.10
8	$4.00	$1.60
9	$4.05	$2.20
10	$4.07	$2.90

a.Fill in the marginal columns, and identify the efficient clean-up level. At the efficient clean-up level, what are the net benefits to the family? What are the net benefits to the family if the floor is completely clean?

b.Graph the marginal costs and marginal benefits of clean-up.

c.Suppose that Joan initially has the right to dump as many clothes as she likes (and dad has to pick upas is the case for a small kid). If there are no transactions costs associated with bargaining between dad and child, what would Coase predict would be the outcome, and how, specifically, would we get there? (Hintit has to do with bribery).

d.Now as Joan grows up, dad decides to flip the property rights. Joan no longer has the right to dump her clothes in the living room. Ronald has the authority to penalize Joan (by withholding allowance) if she dumps any clothes. Assuming no transactions costs, what would Coase predict would be the outcome, and how, specifically, would we get there? (Hint: Coase would be a weird dad, since he would.do what?).