Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!
Question
1 Approved Answer

The living room floor at Ronald Coase's house is common property. His daughter, Joan, really likes to drop clothing items on the living room floor;

image text in transcribed

The living room floor at Ronald Coase's house is common property. His daughter, Joan, really likes to drop clothing items on the living room floor; Ronald hates this form of littering. If Joan is left to do as she wishes, she will drop 10 items of clothing per week. The table below indicates Ronald's total willingness-to-pay (WTP) to stop this littering (or, alternatively, his willingness-to-accept (WTA) to allow littering to go on). It also shows Joan's total WTA to stop her from dropping clothes (or alternatively, her WTP to be allowed to continue with the practice). Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) and Willingness-to-Accept (WTA) Values for Reduction of Clothes Litter Ronald's Ronald's Clothes Joan's Total Marginal Joan's Total Dropping WTA for WTP Marginal WTA WTP for Reduced clean-up clean-up (Items/week) ($ /week) ($/item/ ($/item/week) ($ /week) week) 0 $0.00 |$0.00 1 $1.50 $0.03 2 $2.70 $0.12 3 $3.75 $0.23 14 $4.50 $0.38 5 $5.10 $0.60 16 $5.55 $1.05 7 $5.85 $1.65 18 $6.00 $2.40 19 $6.08 10 $4.35 $3.30 $6.11 1. Fill in the marginal columns, and identify the efficient clean-up level. At the efficient clean-up level, what are the net benefits to the family? (Show your work) What are the net benefits to the family if the floor is completely clean? (Show your work) 2. Graph the marginal costs and marginal benefits of clean-up. (You can do this with spreadsheet software or a sketch, remember to label curves and axes.) 3. Suppose that Joan initially has the right to dump as many clothes as she likes (and dad has to pick up-as is the case for a small kid). If there are no transactions costs associated with bargaining between dad and child, what would Coase predict would be the outcome, and how, specifically, would we get there? (Hint-it has to do with bribery). 4. Now as Joan grows up, dad decides to flip the property rights. Joan no longer has the right to dump her clothes in the living room. Ronald has the authority to penalize Joan (by withholding allowance) if she dumps any clothes. Assuming no transactions costs, what would Coase predict would be the outcome, and how, specifically, would we get there? (Hint: Coase would be a weird dad, since he would....do what?). The living room floor at Ronald Coase's house is common property. His daughter, Joan, really likes to drop clothing items on the living room floor; Ronald hates this form of littering. If Joan is left to do as she wishes, she will drop 10 items of clothing per week. The table below indicates Ronald's total willingness-to-pay (WTP) to stop this littering (or, alternatively, his willingness-to-accept (WTA) to allow littering to go on). It also shows Joan's total WTA to stop her from dropping clothes (or alternatively, her WTP to be allowed to continue with the practice). Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) and Willingness-to-Accept (WTA) Values for Reduction of Clothes Litter Ronald's Ronald's Clothes Joan's Total Marginal Joan's Total Dropping WTA for WTP Marginal WTA WTP for Reduced clean-up clean-up (Items/week) ($ /week) ($/item/ ($/item/week) ($ /week) week) 0 $0.00 |$0.00 1 $1.50 $0.03 2 $2.70 $0.12 3 $3.75 $0.23 14 $4.50 $0.38 5 $5.10 $0.60 16 $5.55 $1.05 7 $5.85 $1.65 18 $6.00 $2.40 19 $6.08 10 $4.35 $3.30 $6.11 1. Fill in the marginal columns, and identify the efficient clean-up level. At the efficient clean-up level, what are the net benefits to the family? (Show your work) What are the net benefits to the family if the floor is completely clean? (Show your work) 2. Graph the marginal costs and marginal benefits of clean-up. (You can do this with spreadsheet software or a sketch, remember to label curves and axes.) 3. Suppose that Joan initially has the right to dump as many clothes as she likes (and dad has to pick up-as is the case for a small kid). If there are no transactions costs associated with bargaining between dad and child, what would Coase predict would be the outcome, and how, specifically, would we get there? (Hint-it has to do with bribery). 4. Now as Joan grows up, dad decides to flip the property rights. Joan no longer has the right to dump her clothes in the living room. Ronald has the authority to penalize Joan (by withholding allowance) if she dumps any clothes. Assuming no transactions costs, what would Coase predict would be the outcome, and how, specifically, would we get there? (Hint: Coase would be a weird dad, since he would....do what?)

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_step_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_step3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Lessons Learned On The Audit Trail

Authors: Richard F.Chambers, CIA, QIAL, CGAP, CCSA, CRMA

1st Edition

ISBN: 0894139037, 978-0894139031

More Books

Students explore these related Accounting questions