The Mayor of Anytown was a respected individual in town. Everywhere he went, people walked up to him and asked to have their picture taken with him. Then, a newspaper reporter, Scoop, wrote an article in the local newspaper which specifically stated that the Mayor had misappropriated funds from the town in order to build a vacation house in another state. Scoop had heard this information from a normally reliable source, but took no steps to check the accuracy of the information. After publication of the article, Mayor vehemently denied the accusations of impropriety. In fact, the Mayor did not misappropriate any funds. However, his approval rating plummeted, people started to shun him in public, and he was defeated by a relatively unknown candidate in the next Anytown mayoral election. If Mayor brings suit against Scoop for defamation, what is the probable result? a) Judgment for Scoop, because he was not actively trying to hurt the Mayor by his article. b) Judgment for Mayor, if Scoop's failure to make any inquiry regarding the accuracy of his assertions in the article concerning the Mayor was considered reckless. O c) Judgment for Mayor, because Scoop's false article concerning the Mayor's reputation was published in the town newspaper and directly caused the Mayor to experience public embarrassment, and directly caused the loss his election defeat. d) Judgment for Scoop, because his position as a town reporter gave him a public interest privilege to write articles about public figures like Mayor