The minister of Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is responsible for many areas within his portfolio, but he cannot personally attend to each one of those areas and therefore he delegates authority to immigration officers to carry out most of his responsibilities. Which of the following is not an area that can be delegated to officers?

Group of answer choices

Deciding cases on humanitarian and compassionate grounds

Issuing a security certificate to a person deemed to be inadmissible

Processing applications for permanent residence overseas

Issuing an extension of a study permit to an international student

Mr Olive arrived at the port of entry seeking to enter Canada as a visitor. He was examined by a CBSA officer, who had information in his possession that Mr Olive appeared on the Interpol watch list for drug trafficking. The officer carried out a search and seizure of Mr Olive's luggage and telephone and arrested him. Mr Olive launched a complaint stating the officer had no power to carry out the search and seizure or to arrest him. Is Mr Olive correct?

Group of answer choices

No, he is not correct. The officer had reasonable grounds to believe Mr Olive to be inadmissible to Canada

Yes, Mr Olive was not carrying any drugs with him nor did he break any laws upon entering for the officer to justify his actions

Yes, the officer should have respected Mr Olive's privacy and procedural fairness rights and should have obtained a warrant to arrest him

None of the above

What are the legal sources that constitute Canadian Immigration law?

Group of answer choices

The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, The Constitution, Access to Information Act, Geneva Conventions Act.

IRPA, The Constitution, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Federal- Provincial\Territorial Agreements.

The Constitution, IRPA, The Criminal Code, Administrative Tribunals.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Federal- Provincial\Territorial Agreements, DACA, NAFTA

Which of the following statements best reflects the balance between the federal government and provinces in Canada concerning immigration?

Group of answer choices

There is a shared responsibility, with the federal government setting overall immigration policy and provinces having a role in selecting immigrants based on regional needs.

The federal government has exclusive control over immigration policies, with provinces having minimal input.

Provinces have the sole authority to determine immigration quotas and policies, while the federal government plays a supporting role.

Provinces haveutonomy in immigration matters, and the federal government's involvement is limited to international relations.

Singh vs Minister of Employment and Immigration is an important case law because:

Group of answer choices

It created a legal amendment to IRPA, and revised Canada's Criminal Code.

It certifies who is protected under the Charter and sets our procedural requirements for fairness.

It certified who has the legal right to work in Canada as an immigrant

The ministry of employment is involved, and it was decided in the 1980s

Statues and Regulations differ in that

Group of answer choices

They are the same

Statues are written codes of law dealing with specific subject matter while regulations fill in the details regarding how the law is to be implemented.

Regulations fill in the details regarding how the law is to be implemented while statues explain the operation of legislation and regulation.

Regulations only impact provinces while statues are federally governed

Three Ministers bear responsibility for immigration matters:

Group of answer choices

The Minister of Housing and Diversity and Inclusion, The Minister of PSEP, and The Minister of Employment and Social Development.

The Minister of Employment and Social Development, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister of National Defense.

The Minister of Employment and Social Development, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister of National Defense.

The Minister of IRCC, The Minister of Employment and Social Development, and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.

Which body enforces removal of non-citizens in Canada?

Group of answer choices

IRCC

Immigration and Refugee Board

FBI

CBSA

Every person can be found inadmissible to Canada, even citizens

Group of answer choices

True

False

Misrepresentation is not considered applicable if the person did not mean to do it

Group of answer choices

True

False

Domestic violence, drug trafficking or sale, sexual assault, and murder, can cause inadmissibility on the grounds of

Group of answer choices

Serious Criminality

Security

Asylum

Family inadmissibility

Convention Refugees and Protected Persons are exempted from certain grounds of inadmissibility

Group of answer choices

True

False

A foreign national wishing to come to Canada as a permanent resident or for a temporary purpose must apply for and obtain a visa or other authorization to enter Canada. What must they prove in order for their application to be accepted?

Group of answer choices

They have to prove that they will be able to successfully establish in Canada and contribute to the region in which they will settle

They have to prove that they have submitted the required forms, the documents to prove they meet the requirements, and the processing fees

They have to prove that they meet the requirements under the category they are applying and they must also prove they are not inadmissible

They have to prove that they meet the requirements under the category they are applying and that they have sufficient funds to settle in Canada

Canada's selection criteria underwent a fundamental change that targeted the racial and ethnic bias in their previous selection style. This occurred:

Group of answer choices

In the mid-1960s

In the mid-1970s

At the beginning of the 1950s

At the end of the 1980s

Mr Kim came to Canada as a permanent resident. After living in Canada for two years he had to tend to his business in his country. When he returned to Canada a year and a half later, he made an application for citizenship. In his application, he stated that he had resided in Canada for three and half years, thus meeting the residency requirement to become a Canadian citizen. Under what inadmissibility provision can Mr Kim be charged and what could be the consequences?

Group of answer choices

He could be charged with misrepresentation, but he will get away with it becuse it is a minor issue.

He showed his appreciation for Canada by wanting to become a citizen, there would be no consequences

He could be charged with misrepresentation, he falsely claimed he resided in Canda longer than he really has.

He could be charged with criminality, be sent to a hearing, and be ordered deported from Canada