The net present value $($NPV$)$ and internal rate of return $($IRR$)$ methods of investment analysis are interrelated and are sometimes used together to make capital budgeting decisions.

Consider the case of Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc.:

Last Tuesday, Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc. lost a portion of its planning and financial data when both its main and its backup servers crashed. The company$$s CFO remembers that the internal rate of return $($IRR$)$ of Project Zeta is $13\mathrm{.}8\%,$ but he can$$t recall how much Blue Hamster originally invested in the project nor the project$$s net present value $($NPV$).$ However, he found a note that detailed the annual net cash flows expected to be generated by Project Zeta. They are:

Year

Cash Flow

Year $1$ $$1,800,000$

Year $2$ $$3,375,000$

Year $3$ $$3,375,000$

Year $4$ $$3,375,000$

The CFO has asked you to compute Project Zeta$$s initial investment using the information currently available to you. He has offered the following suggestions and observations:

$$ A project$$s IRR represents the return the project would generate when its NPV is zero or the discounted value of its cash inflows equals the discounted value of its cash outflows$$when the cash flows are discounted using the project$$s IRR.

$$ The level of risk exhibited by Project Zeta is the same as that exhibited by the company$$s average project, which means that Project Zeta$$s net cash flows can be discounted using Blue Hamster$$s $10\%$ WACC.

Given the data and hints, Project Zeta$$s initial investment is $,$ and its NPV is $($rounded to the nearest whole dollar$).$

A project$$s IRR will if the project$$s cash inflows increase, and everything else is unaffected.