The next four questions involve the following conversation between JACK and LISA. JACK: \"When it comes to COVIDlg, it is always important to trust public health authorities.\" LISA: \"Public health authorities have frequently been wrong throughout the pandemic, and the shifting goalposts undermine trust in their directives.\" JACK: \"That's ridiculous.\" LISA: \"Is it? The public health narrative promised that restrictions would end if the majority of people got vaccinated. That Clearly hasn't happened. For example, Gibraltar implemented a lockdown despite having a vaccination rate of 100 percent.\" JACK: \"You're just an insane antivaxxer.\" LISA: \"I'm fully vaccinated against COVlD19, but I oppose vaccine mandates and vac cine passports. There is no good evidence that the available crop of vaccines signicantly prevent the spread of COVID19 * though they may temporarily reduce symptoms. In either case this is an unconscionable violation of people's liberties.\" JACK: \"That's so heartless and cruel! You make me want to cry. Don't you know that almost 30,000 people in Canada have died with COVIDlg?\" 1. In this conversation, Jack commits a serious of logical errors. What is the first logical fallacy he commits? (A) Argumentum ad populum. (B) Red Herring. C) Appeal to Experts. (D) Argumentum ad hominem. 2. What is the second logical fallacy that Jack commits? (A) Argumentum ad hominem. (B) Straw Man. (C) Appeal to Emotion. (D) Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc. 3. What is the final logical fallacy that Jack commits? (A) Argumentum ad hominem. B) Straw Man. C) Appeal to Emotion. (D) Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc. 4. In addition to his logical fallacies, Jack also commits a statistical (inductive) fallacy. Which one? (A) Biased Sample. (B) Berkson's Paradox. (C) Correlation implies causation. (D) Base Rate Fallacy