The nutrition label for a new barbecue sauce states that one bottle of sauce has900mg of sodium. A local consumer group claims that the sodium content is higher than what is reported on the label. To determine the accuracy of the label, the FDA randomly selects 12 bottles of the sauce and determines the sodium content. Is theresufficientevidence to support the local consumer group's claim that the sodium content is higher than the nutrition label states? Assume the data are normally distributed and use a significance level of 0.01.

Sodium Content (in mg):

924	898	905	889	915	882
908	905	897	904	914	893

Step3of3: Draw a conclusion and interpret the decision.

A.) Werejectthe null hypothesis and conclude that there issufficient evidence at a0.01level of significance that the sodium content of the barbecue sauce is higher than what is reported on the nutrition label.

B.) Wefail to rejectthe null hypothesis and conclude that there isinsufficientevidence at a0.01level of significance that the sodium content of the barbecue sauce is higher than what is reported on the nutrition label.

C.) Werejectthe null hypothesis and conclude that there isinsufficientevidence at a0.01level of significance that the sodium content of the barbecue sauce is higher than what is reported on the nutrition label.

D.) Wefail to rejectthe null hypothesis and conclude that there issufficient evidence at a0.01level of significance that the sodium content of the barbecue sauce is higher than what is reported on the nutrition label.