Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

The Ontario government decided to widen Highway 401. The highway project would be carried out in three (3) phases: phase 1, phase 2 and phase

The Ontario government decided to widen Highway 401. The highway project would be carried out in three (3) phases: phase 1, phase 2 and phase 3. Therefore, the government issued three (3) separate calls for tender (also known as calls for bid) i.e., a call for tender for each phase.

There were five (5) road construction companies in the region qualified to bid on the projects: Avery Ltd, Benson Ltd, Cohen Ltd, Dixon Ltd and Enrique Ltd.

The senior executives of Avery Ltd, Benson Ltd, and Cohen Ltd were long-time friends. They communicated on a regular basis and were determined to keep out smaller start-up companies from competing with them for government contracts. During lunch at a restaurant, the senior executives from Avery Ltd, Benson Ltd and Cohen Ltd agreed verbally that only one company would bid and then the work would be divided amongst the three contractors. Further, they agreed that Avery Ltd would submit a bid for each call. Each bid would not mention Benson Ltd and Cohen Ltd.

Dixon Ltd and Enrique Ltd. were start-up construction companies. Both companies had limited financial resources. Dixon Ltd and Enrique Ltd. decided to submit a bid together for each call for tender. In each bid, it was noted that Dixon Ltd and Enrique Ltd were working together.

The results for each call are summarized below:

Call for tender # 1: Avery Ltd was the successful bidder

Call for tender # 2: Dixon Ltd and Enrique Ltd were the successful bidder.

Call for tender # 3: Avery Ltd was the successful bidder.

The auditor for the Ontario government decided to review the bids as part of a routine audit of all government highway contracts. During the review, the auditor noticed that Benson Ltd and Cohen Ltd did not submit any bids despite the fact that they were known to be established construction companies in the region. Then the auditor received a tip from a former employee of Cohen Ltd about the verbal agreement between Avery Ltd, Benson Ltd, and Cohen Ltd.This former employee also heard the executives from Avery Ltd, Benson Ltd, and Cohen Ltd discuss their plan to "drive Dixon Ltd and Enrique Ltd out of business." As well, a disgruntled former employee from Dixon Ltd alleged Dixon Ltd and Enrique Ltd were "colluding together" in all the calls for tender.

Advise the auditor of the following:

A) Which statute is intended to preserve or promote competition in the marketplace? Is it a federal or provincial statue? Which public body is responsible for investigating of any complaints under this statute? (3 marks)

B)Did Avery Ltd, Benson Ltd and Cohen Ltd take part in anything illegal? Why or why not? (13 marks)

C) Did Dixon Ltd and Enrique Ltd take part in anything illegal? Why or why not? (4 marks)

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Law Express Consumer And Commercial Law

Authors: Judith Tillson

6th Edition

1292295775, 978-1292295770

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Differentiate tan(7x+9x-2.5)

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Explain the sources of recruitment.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Differentiate sin(5x+2)

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Compute the derivative f(x)=1/ax+bx

Answered: 1 week ago