the opinion in this case

A company in New York that designed and sold jewelry asserted claims alleging copyright infringement, federal trade dress infringement, federal unfair competition, and state law unfair competition that were sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss by demonstrating that a New York company and businesses that operated in Hong Kong and India sold jewelry that was substantially similar to the jewelry the New York company sold. It was necessary to determine if the three businesses that did business in Hong Kong and India were the three defendants or not.