The oppression remedy is

	1.	a statutory procedure allowing individual board members to seek a personal remedy if they have been unfairly treated by the CEO.
	2.	a statutory procedure allowing individual directors to seek a personal remedy against shareholders if they have been unfairly treated.
	3.	a statutory procedure allowing individual shareholders to seek a personal remedy if they have been unfairly treated.
	4.	a statutory procedure allowing individual board members to seek a personal remedy if they have been unfairly treated by shareholders.
	5.	a statutory procedure allowing individual board members to seek a personal remedy if they have been unfairly treated by directors.

2.

To establish negligence, a plaintiff must prove:

	1.	that, on the balance of probabilities and beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendent owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached the required standard of care, that the plaintiff suffered injury or damage and the defendant's conduct caused the plaintiff's damage
	2.	that, beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendent owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached the required standard of care, and the defendant's conduct was the cause. If you prove causation, it is not necessary to prove damages or that any harm was suffered. It is the principle of the thing - that it happened at all - that matters.
	3.	that, beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendent owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached the required standard of care, that the plaintiff suffered injury or damage and the defendant's conduct caused the plaintiff's damage
	4.	that, on the balance of probabilities, the defendent owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached the required standard of care, and the defendant's conduct was the cause. If you prove causation, it is not necessary to prove damages or that any harm was suffered. It is the principle of the thing - that it happened at all - that matters.
	5.	that, on the balance of probabilities, the defendent owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached the required standard of care, that the plaintiff suffered injury or damage and the defendant's conduct caused the plaintiff's damage

3.

Business negotiations usually involve the exchange of offers and counter offers. A contract is only formed when:

	1.	when both sides exchange offers and/or counter offers. The act of this exchange creates the contract between - the contract to continue negotiating.
	2.	an offer by one side was accepted without alteration, modification or condition by the other side, after the side making the offer sent a revocation
	3.	an offer by one side is accepted with a counter offer by the other side
	4.	an offer by one side is accepted without alteration, modification or condition by the other side
	5.	an offer by one side is accepted without alteration, modification or condition by the other side, except with a minor change to one term that is of very little consequence to the whole agreement in the opinion of the side accepting

4.

In the grand scheme of bankruptcy law, the effect of a proposal, if accepted, is that it allows the debtor to retain control of his property. This is done by

	1.	a debtor making an offer to his creditors, providing for the orderly repayment of debts, or some part of his debts, over a period of time. Monies payable under the proposal must be paid to the trustee for distribution to the creditors.
	2.	a debtor sending a lengthy explanation and apology to each creditor asking for debt relief and whatever the creditors offer, if anything, incorporating into new terms of repayment to attempt to pay some of the debts off. If unable to, repeating the process so that creditors lower the amount once more.
	3.	a debtor personally making an offer to each and every one of his creditors, providing a proposal to repay some of his debts, or some part of his debts, over a period of time. Monies payable are paid directly to the creditor by the debtor.
	4.	a debtor making an announcement to his creditors, advising no repayment of debts forthcoming.
	5.	a debtor personally reassuring his creditors that he would do better in the future and asking his creditors for loan or debt forgiveness with no, or nominal, payments against debts owing.

5.

The unintentional tort of negligent misrepresentation does not require knowledge of the falseness of the information, only carelessness in its creation. To prove negligent misrepresentation, there must be a duty of care based on a "special relationship" between the representor and the representee and

	1.	the representee must have reasonably relied on the negligent misrepresentation.
	2.	all of the above.
	3.	the representor must have acted negligently in making the misrepresentation. They must have fallen below the standard of care required of a professional making such a representation.
	4.	the representation in question must be untrue, inaccurate, or misleading.
	5.	the reliance must have been detrimental to the representee and damages resulted.