The owner of a jewelry store brought a civil action against a former clerk for the value of various pieces of jewelry missing from the store. The defendant had been fired after another employee had reported that the defendant was stealing jewelry. At the trial, the plaintiff calls his employee as a witness. The witness testifies that he does not remember either having seen the defendant take anything from the store or having told the plaintiff that she had done so. The plaintiff then takes the witness stand and proposes to testify to what the witness had told him about seeing the defendant stealing pieces of jewelry from the store. Assuming appropriate objection by the defendant, would such testimony by the plaintiff be admissible? Group of answer choices No, as inadmissible hearsay if offered to prove theft by the defendant. Yes, as proper impeachment of the witness's testimony. No, as irrelevant. Yes, as a statement against interest by the witness