The PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Louis LAURIA et al., Defendants and Respondents. 251 Cal. App. 2d 471, 59 Cal. Rptr. 628 (1967).

Suppose Mr. Lauria provided answering services to a marijuana dealer with the knowledge that his service was taking messages for such a drug dealer. Given your reading of the Lauria case, and its summary of Direct Sales and Falcone, what would you predict the outcome of such a case to be? Why? Would your response change if the dealer were selling crack cocaine? Why or why not?