1. The plaintiff was committed to the Hastings State Hospital by order of the Probate Court, which found him to be "mentally illinebriate." The commitment petition was brought by the plaintiff's mother, apparently to secure treatment for him for a developing drug and alcohol problem. Several attempts at voluntary treatment, prior to the commitment proceedings, had proven unsuccessful. Shortly after admission, the plaintiff allegedly attempted to strangle a member of the hospital staff and was transferred to the Security Hospital. Upon admission to the Security Hospital, the plaintiff was diagnosed with simple schizophrenia. He was treated with tranquilizing and antidepressant medications but apparently failed to improve. Consent was sought from the plaintiff's mother to administer electroshock treatment. Consent was not given, but the mother did request the consultation of a second psychiatrist, who concurred with the physicians at Security Hospital. Without the consent of the plaintiff or his mother, electroshock treatment was begun. Did this treatment without consent invade the patient's privacy?