The plaintiffs sign was given St. Josephs aspirin for children when he had the flu. The aspirin triggered Reyes syndrome, leaving the child a quadriplegic, blind, and mentally retarded. The aspirin contained a warning, approved by the food and drug administration, about the dangers of giving aspirin to children with the flu. The product was advertised in Spanish in the Los Angeles area, but the warning was not in Spanish. The childs guardians could not read English. Do you believe the court impose liability on the company for failure of its duty to warn? Why or Why not?

[Ramirez v. Plough, Inc., 25 Cal. Rptr. 2d (1993).]