The police have, for decades, beentelling people to "move along" and disperse. Sometimes it's a complaining neighbor who doesn't like the fact that people are standing in groups, other times, it's an apparent gang congregating on their declared corner.

Unless someone is standing on a public highway and creating a hazard, the police oftentimes cannot legally tell someone to "move along". When people have refused to disperse, officers have, in some cases arrested the person who would not cooperate and charged them with disobeying a police officer or disorderly conduct-like offenses.

What's your opinion of the police being able to order people to disperse when they are not actually on a highway. Should they be able to do so? Defend your opinion.