The poll/survey/experiment demonstrated that plants receiving more hours of sunlight and being watered more frequently generally had taller heights compared to those receiving less sunlight and water. This indicates that both sunlight and water are crucial factors for plant growth. The negative correlation between sunlight exposure, watering frequency, and plant height may come was surprising because of the negative results. It's possible that other factors not considered in the hypothesis, such as soil quality, nutrients, or genetic factors, may be influencing plant growth in unexpected ways. I do think my poll/survey question were appropriate. I think that a big limitation in my study was sunlight, even though sunlight is crucial for plant growth, too much of it can be harmful. Using less sunlight to see a different results. Compare and contrast observational studies with experimental studies. Discuss at least two common issues that can affect the validity of experimental studies. Include an example for each. In a research article, it is common for researchers to identify the next steps for their study. Often, the "next steps" are to address the limitations they identified in their study. Based upon you work in part 8, identify some next steps for your study