Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

The prosecution believes that Ella stole 1.5 million dollars from her previous employer but Ella claims she didn't. At the pre trial admissibility hearing I

The prosecution believes that Ella stole 1.5 million dollars from her previous employer but Ella claims she didn't. At the pre trial admissibility hearing I would like to know if Ella's personal spending in the last 4 months would be a significant evidence and be admissible in court. Ella spent $100,000 on drugs and $100,000 on night clubs in the past 4 months after the theft occurred. Does this satisfy section 7 and 8 of the Evidence Act 2006 and can this be used as evidence at a pre trial admissibility hearing? is Ellas spending in the past 4 months admissible as evidence?And why exactly using section 7 and 8 of the evidence act 2006 Please explain in depth because some Tutors are telling me that it is admissible and some are saying its inadmissible.

thanks :)

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Constitutional Law A Contemporary Approach

Authors: Gregory Maggs, Peter Smith

5th Edition

1684675715, 978-1684675715

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

What is TCO?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

1. To take in the necessary information,

Answered: 1 week ago