The researchers should be able to determine the best study methods to gather adequate information about the selected topic or questions. Therefore, they should rely on qualitative and quantitative articles to familiarize themselves with techniques involving participant selection and data collection or analysis to effectively choose the research approach for their studies. However, differentiating the data collection and evaluation for quantitative and qualitative write-ups will enhance the determination of the research tactic that can help acquire enough quality information (Ramlo, 2020). According to Campos (2021) and Dardis et al. (2018), the data collection methods for both quantitative and qualitative studies are interviews, surveys, and questionnaires. Besides, Braun (2021) indicates that researchers can collect quantitative data by experimenting, and Dardis et al. (2018) demonstrate that the observation method is vital for gathering qualitative information. Also, Braun (2021) and Campos (2021) reveal that correlation and descriptive methods are essential for analyzing quantitative data, whereas Dardis et al. (2018) show that thematic analysis helps to evaluate qualitative data. Therefore, understanding the data collection and analysis methods for qualitative and quantitative studies helps to select a suitable research approach.

Moreover, the information about the participants' selection enhances awareness of the qualitative and quantitative research methods. The scholars conducting qualitative studies select participants having the potential to offer information relevant to the study question or topic. For example, Gidycz et al. (2018), Brownstone et al. (2018), and Dardis et al. (2018) have chosen victims of military sexual trauma (MST) to gather information about sexual harassment or assault in the armed forces. On the contrary, the researchers conducting the quantitative studies select the participants randomly to avoid interfering with external variables and increase the chances of acquiring generalized results. For example, Campos (2021) and Braun (2021) selected their participants randomly to reduce the chances of obtaining biased information about MST. I would consider using a quantitative study approach after comparing the two research methods, for this study technique offers relatable, numerical, and scientific data (Bush & Amechi, 2019). Indeed, the researchers should familiarize themselves with different tactics for collecting and analyzing to choose between the qualitative and quantitative research methods successfully.

When might quantitative (numbers) also be helpful even with this type of sensitive topic?