Question
The researchers thought that the omnibus F test was not telling the whole story. They looked back over the week and created a new design
The researchers thought that the omnibus F test was not telling the whole story. They looked back over the week and created a new design based on their initial hypotheses. Since happiness was measured at the beginning of the study and at the end of the study, they created a second factor (pretest, posttest).
Using this "mixed-model" factorial ANOVA design, they set about testing whether the effectiveness of reminiscing strategies looked different at pretest and posttest. Results indicated:
- No significant main effect of condition (imagery, memorability, control), p > .05,eta-squared =0.00
- A significant main effect of time (pretest, posttest), F(1,59) = 4.70, p < 0.04, eta-squared= 0.07
- A significant condition X time interaction, F(2,59) = 3.22, p < 0.05, eta-squared =0.10
Question 17 of 394 Points How would you interpret the main effect of time?
Averaging across time, there were significant differences in happiness across the three conditions(imagery, memorabilia, control)
Averaging across condition (imagery, memorabilia, control), there were significant differences in happiness across time
Averaging across time, there were significant differences in happiness between every condition (imagery, memorabilia, control)
Averaging across condition (imagery, memorabilia, control), there were no significant differences in happiness across time Reset Selection | |
Question 18 of 394 Points How would you interpret the main effect of condition?
There were significant differences between pre and posttest happiness, averaging across time
There were no significant differences between conditions (imagery, memorabilia, control), averaging across time
There were significant differences between pre and posttest happiness, averaging across condition (imagery, memorabilia, control)
There were significant differences between condition (imagery, memorabilia, control)averaging across time Reset Selection | |
Question 19 of 394 Points How would you interpret the interaction?
There was a significant crossover interaction between time and condition
There was a significant difference in the pattern of differences across condition
There was no significant interaction between condition and time
There was a significant difference in the pattern of differences across time Reset Selection | |
Question 20 of 392 Points How many unique conditions (a.k.a. cells) are in a 2 X 3 ANOVA?
5
2
6
3 Reset Selection |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started