The same fund manager wants to recommend an investment in Seattle to the fund investors. He wants to show that there is upward momentum in Seattle's office rents. As the researcher you have prepared the following two slides, which have been generated from the same data. The only difference is that Chart A shows a 10-year time frame (2003-2012), while Chart B only shows the last 5 years (2008-2012) Which of the two charts do you think the fund manager will pick? What, if s/he picks Chart A arguing that "we can justify using that chart because it shows a 10-year time frame and thus has more information than the other one". Is s/he doing the "ethical thing