The starting point of Milton Friedman's argument critiquing Corporate Social Responsibility is the fact that business executives act as the trustees of the corporate owners; they have not been hired by society or stakeholder groups, but are the firm owners' agents that manage the day-to-day operations of the business for the benefit and in the interest of the owners. Friedman's premise is a principled insistence on shareholder primacy. In other words, putting shareholders, or the firm owners, first is not an abrogation of moral responsibility in capitalist economies, but an affirmation of it. Do you agree with this statement? If so, why? If not, why not?

Please write the answer in detail with explanation.