The state of South Carolina passed a law charging an extra fee for out-of-state poultry processors and demanding that their poultry be inspected before it could be sold retail in South Carolina. There was not a similar requirement for in-state poultry. This is justified on grounds that it protects the health and welfare of state residents. Is this law likely to be upheld by a federal court if challenged on constitutional grounds by Braxton Poultry, a Georgia poultry processor? Multiple Choice Yes, the law will likely be upheld because it is within the health, safety or welfare rights of a state to promote legitimate state objectives. No, the law will likely be struck down on grounds that a state may not regulate health issues due to the Supremacy Clause and preemption Yes, the law will likely be upheld because the states have broad, plenary powers to regulate Intrastate commerce. No, the law will likely be struck down on grounds that a state may not discriminate against or place undue burdens on Interstate commerce under the Dormant Commerce Clause