The state passed a law stating that "only persons living with their parents or guardians who are bona fide residents of the state shall be entitled to free public education; all others who wish to attend public schools within the state may do so, but they must pay tuition of $3,000 per semester." A 15-year-old girl moved in with her friend so that she could attend the public schools in the state, and the state legislature passed the tuition statute just as she completed her junior year. The girl wants to complete her senior year in the state high school, but cannot afford to pay tuition. If the girl sues in federal court to strike down the tuition statute, is the court likely to rule that the statute is constitutional? Group of answer choices Yes, unless the girl can show that the statute is not rationally related to a proper state interest. No, because it infringes on the girl's fundamental right to an education. Yes, provided that the state can show that the statute is necessary to promote a compelling state interest. No, because it interferes with the girl's fundamental right to interstate travel