Question
The Supreme Court in Batson v. Kentucky provided a three-step process for determining when a strike is discriminatory: First, a defendant must make a prima
The Supreme Court in Batson v. Kentucky provided a three-step process for determining when a strike is discriminatory: "First, a defendant must make a prima facie showing that a peremptory challenge has been exercised on the basis of race; second, if that showing has been made, the prosecution must offer a race-neutral basis for striking the juror in question; and third, in light of the parties' submissions, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has shown purposeful discrimination." What possible problems might arise that prevent a court from rightfully determining a strike is discrimi-natory as happened in this case? What changes would you make to the three-step process to prevent further transgressions?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started