The Supreme Court in Batson v. Kentucky provided a three-step process for determining when a strike is discriminatory: "First, a defendant must make a prima facie showing that a peremptory challenge has been exercised on the basis of race; second, if that showing has been made, the prosecution must offer a race-neutral basis for striking the juror in question; and third, in light of the parties' submissions, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has shown purposeful discrimination." What possible problems might arise that prevent a court from rightfully determining a strike is discrimi-natory as happened in this case? What changes would you make to the three-step process to prevent further transgressions?