The term discrimination is not given a single definition in the BC human rights code. So how is its meaning addressed by the courts then?

A) The courts have initially interpreted discrimination to mean an intentional act of exclusion

B) There is no objective test to establish discrimination, therefore, the courts are reluctant to define its meaning

C) The courts interpretation is based on a purely subjective interpretation of the facts in any given case

D) If the courts are able to establish a prima facie case of discrimination based on the facts, then the onus is on the complainant to prove the employers conduct is not justified

E) The courts have refrained from defining discrimination but rather allow organizations to define it themselves