The trial ends, and jury deliberation begins. You are a member of the jury. A wealth of evidence has been presented. What is really sticking out, however, is the testimony of Tareq, explaining the circumstances of the crime and the injury incurred. Tareq was a powerful witness and seemed to be of good characterat least the defense didn't tear apart his character, which to you speaks volumes. You trust what he says. What would you do? A) You decide to vote "not guilty." While the victim testimony is hard to ignore, the lack of intent casts serious doubt. You know that if you doubt the guilt of a person, you have to find them not guilty as a juror. B) You decide to vote "guilty." Your decision is mostly based on the victim's testimony. You find yourself trusting the victim of this violent crime. It seems like undeniable proof that Robert is guilty of the offense