Question
The UML Entity Relationship at the bottom of this question is it correct based of the parts hightlighted? A Data Integration Model Some consultants believe
The UML Entity Relationship at the bottom of this question is it correct based of the parts hightlighted?
A Data Integration Model
Some consultants believe it is inefficient to maintain multiple databases for the two companies whose merger was presented in the Discussion. They recommend a single data source as the best solution for data integration. Therefore, all the data from both companies will be merged into a single set of tables, and the reports will be generated from this merged database.
The tables and data from the Unit 2 Application are shown below.
CUSTOMERS (ID, NAME(LAST FIRST), ADDRESS, CURRENT BALANCE, CREDIT LIMIT, SALES REP ID) | |||||||||
124 | ADAMS | SALLY | 481 | OAK | LANSING | MI 49224 | 818.75 | 1000 | 3 |
256 | SAMUELS | ANN | 215 | PETE | GRANT | MI 49219 | 21.5 | 1500 | 6 |
311 | CHARLES | DON | 48 | COLLEGE | IRA | MI 49034 | 825.75 | 1000 | 12 |
315 | DANIELS | TOM | 914 | CHERRY | KENT | MI 48391 | 770.75 | 750 | 6 |
405 | WILLIAMS | AL | 519 | WATSON | GRANT | MI 49219 | 402.75 | 1500 | 12 |
412 | ADAMS | SALLY | 16 | ELM | LANSING | MI 49224 | 1817.5 | 2000 | 3 |
522 | NELSON | MARY | 108 | PINE | ADA | MI 49441 | 98.75 | 1500 | 12 |
567 | DINH | TRAN | 808 | RIDGE | HARPER | MI 48421 | 402.4 | 750 | 6 |
587 | GALVEZ | MARA | 512 | PINE | ADA | MI 49441 | 114.6 | 1000 | 6 |
622 | MARTIN | DAN | 419 | CHIP | GRANT | MI 49219 | 1045.75 | 1000 | 3 |
SALES REPS (ID, NAME(LAST FIRST), ADDRESS, TOTAL COMMISSION, COMMISSION RATE) | ||||||||
3 | JONES | MARY | 123 | MAIN | GRANT | MI 49219 | 2150 | .05 |
6 | SMITH | WILLIAM | 102 | RAYMOND | ADA | MI 49441 | 4912.5 | .07 |
12 | DIAZ | MIGUEL | 419 | HARPER | LANSING | MI 49224 | 2150 | .05 |
ORDERS(ID, ORDER DATE, CUSTOMER, SHIPPING DATE) |
12489 02-JUL-11 124 22-JUL-11 |
12491 02-JUL-11 311 22-JUL-11 |
12494 04-JUL-11 315 12-JUL-11 |
12495 04-JUL-11 256 22-AUG-11 |
12498 05-JUL-11 522 |
12500 05-JUL-11 124 22-AUG-11 |
12504 05-JUL-11 522 |
ORDER LINES (ORDER ID, PART ID, NUMBER ORDERED, QUOTED PRICE) | ||
12489 AX12 11 | 21.95 | |
12491 BT04 1 | 149.99 | |
12491 BZ66 1 | 399.99 | |
12494 CB03 4 | 279.99 | |
12495 CX11 2 | 22.95 | |
12498 AZ52 2 | 12.95 | |
12500 BT04 1 | 149.99 | |
12504 CZ81 2 | 325.99 |
PARTS (PART ID, PART DESCRIPTION, UNITS ON HAND, CLASS, WAREHOUSE NUMBER, UNIT PRICE) | |||
AX12 IRON | 104 HW 3 | 24.95 | |
AZ52 DARTBOARD | 20 SG 2 | 12.95 | |
BH22 CORNPOPPER | 95 HW 3 | 24.95 | |
BT04 GAS GRILL | 11 AP 2 | 149.99 | |
BZ66 WASHER | 52 AP 3 | 39.99 | |
CA14 GRIDDLE | 78 HW 3 | 39.99 | |
CB03 BIKE | 44 SG 1 | 299.99 | |
CX11 BLENDER | 112 HW 3 | 22.95 | |
CZ81 TREADMILL | 68 SG 2 | 349.95 |
The tables and data for the company you are merging with are shown below.
CUSTOMER (CUST NO, NAME (LAST FIRST), ADDRESS, E-MAIL, PRIMARY PHONE, CURRENT BALANCE, CREDIT LIMIT, SALES REP ID) | ||||||||||
100 | ADAMS | SALLY | 481 | OAK | LANSING | MI 49224 | NULL 444-555-1212 | 500.25 | 1500 | 2 |
108 | SMITH | JON | 215 | PETE | GRANT | MI 49219 | jsmith@xxx.com NULL | 21.5 | 1500 | 15 |
124 | ROAST | CHUCK | 48 | COLLEGE | IRA | MI 49034 | NULL 444-555-1111 | 825.75 | 1000 | 15 |
101 | WILLIAMS | AL | 914 | CHERRY | KENT | MI 48391 | NULL 444-555-1211 | 125.75 | 2500 | 15 |
SALES REPS (SALES NO, NAME (LAST FIRST), ADDRESS, E-MAIL, COMMISSION RATE) | ||||||||
15 | DALY | SYLVIA | 555 | MAIN | GRANT | MI 49219 | sday@xxx.com | .05 |
2 | JONES | WILLIAM | 15 | SECOND | ADA | MI 49441 | wjones@xxx.com | .07 |
ORDERS (ORDER NO, ORDER DATE, CUSTOMER, STATUS, SHIPPING DATE) |
11223 02-JUN-11 100 1 22-JUN-11 |
11224 02-AUG-11 100 1 15-AUG-11 |
11225 04-AUG-11 101 3 01-SEP-11 |
11226 04-JUL-11 124 2 22-JUL-11 |
ORDER LINES (ORDER NO,PROD ID) |
11223 15 2 |
11223 24 1 |
11223 17 3 |
11224 6 1 |
11226 6 2 |
11226 15 1 |
11225 6 2 |
PRODUCTS (PROD ID, PRODUCT NAME, DESCRIPTION, QTY ON HAND, WAREHOUSE NUMBER, UNIT PRICE) | |||
12 MIXER | 125 3 | 24.95 | |
15 DARTBOARD | 15 2 | 12.95 | |
17 BLENDER | 10 3 | 24.95 | |
1 LAWN MOWER | 2 2 | 149.99 | |
24 WAFFLE MAKER | 17 3 | 39.99 | |
6 FRY PAN | 122 3 | 39.99 | |
8 BIKE | 20 1 | 299.99 | |
18 TREADMILL | 19 2 | 349.95 |
Design a UML model for the new company enterprise. Provide a mapping of the original fields to the fields in your diagram to ensure no data is lost in the transition. All tables must have primary keys and foreign keys. Capture screenshots of the tables.
Create the new database using MySQL and transfer the existing data into the new tables. Clean the data and remove duplicate records as they are transferred to the new tables. Do not destroy the existing data in the original database in case you need to go back and retrieve the original data. Capture screenshots of the data cleaning process.
As you are designing and merging the data, consider the following:
There may be errors in some of the data that will result in inconsistencies and duplicate records. Make reasonable assumptions as to which records are duplicates, and list all assumptions and business rules in your UML model. Define and justify what constitutes a duplicate customer.
The same customer may have a different credit limit for each store. When the stores merge, decide what the customers credit limit will be.
A sales representatives commission is 5%.
Consolidate the current balance due for each customer from each store.
Determine and justify what constitutes the same part/product. Consider storing the inventory to create uniqueness in the parts/products table.
After you create the tables and load the data into them, generate the following reports by creating screenshots or cutting and pasting the results into a Word document:
List each sales representative with their customers last names, first names, addresses, credit limits, and balances.
Show the orders placed over the past 10 years, grouped by customer. Include the order number, order date, ship date, part numbers for ordered parts, quote price, number ordered, and cost for the ordered amount of parts.
A part list including part description, vendor, quantity on hand, and unit price, grouped by warehouse.
(This part is important). I see warehousenumber is the UML as a foreign key, but not associated with a primary key.)
CUSTOMERS CUSTNO (PK) LASTNAME FIRSTNAME ADDRESS EMAIL PRIMARY PHONE CURRENTBALANCE CREDIT LIMIT Process 1..N ORDERS ORDERNO (PK) ORDER DATE CUSTNO (FK) STATUS SHIPPINGDATE PARTS PARTID (PK) PARTDESCRIPTION UNITSONHAND CLASS WAREHOUSENUMBER (FK) UNIT PRICE 1..N 1..N 1.N SALESREPS Interacts With SALESREPID (PK) LASTNAME 1..1 FIRSTNAME ADDRESS E-MAIL TOTALCOMMISSION COMMISSION RATE ORDERLINES Goes In ORDERNO (PK) 1.N PARTID (FK) PRODID (FK) NUMBERORDERED 1.1 QUOTED PRICE 1..1 Contains Contains 1..N PRODUCTS PRODID (PK) PRODUCTNAME DESCRIPTION QTYONHAND WAREHOUSE NO (FK) UNITPRICE
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started