The VP of HR plans to use a new selection exam called Techjob to screen expert applicants in emerging technologies. That exam was developed by a professional consulting firm that found it valid. The VP organized a search committee in charge of recruitment and selection. The committee received 140 applications: 100 white applicants and 40 black applicants. The committee administered a number of selection exams, including the Techjob, and sent a job offer to 40 white and 10 black applicants. However, one of the rejected applicants found it discriminatory because most white applicants were rejected during the screening process. 1. What type of discrimination is most relevant to this scenario? a) Disparate impact b) Disparate treatment c) Hostile environment d) Quid pro quo How could the plaintiff establish a prima facie case? A) Present the statistical difference in selection rate among protected classes. B) Prove that the defendant's argument is pretextual C) Provide evidence proving intentions to treat applicants differently because of protected classes. D) Show that the employer refused to hire me because of a particular protected class even though I was qualified to perform the job. Which court case is most relevant to the scenario? A) Griggs v. Duke Power B) Gratz v. Bollinger C) McDonnell Douglas v. Green D) Toyota v. Williams