The Watts site was destroyed. According to Frustrated Contracts Act 1978 (NSW) No 105, Frustrated Contracts does not affect the promises that Watts should perform before the setback, so Watts 'responsibility will not be lifted because the site is destroyed.

If Watts does not have definitive evidence that Long Island Pty Ltd has committed a breach of contract. The court may rule that Watts pays Long Island Pty Ltd compensation, including Long Island Pty Ltd 's 100,000 Australian Dollars for renting a new venue, and ticket loss costs. Because Watts canceled the concert and spread the fraudulent ticket sales information of Long Island Company, the cost of reputation damage was caused.

Is my understanding of this case complete? Are there other legal factors not expressed?