Question
The well-known nationally syndicated columnist David Broder reported the recent findingsoftwoacademicpoliticalscientists.Thesescholarsfoundthatvotersarequite turned off by negative campaigns of politicians. Many people went as far as not
The well-known nationally syndicated columnist David Broder reported the recent findingsoftwoacademicpoliticalscientists.Thesescholarsfoundthatvotersarequite turned off by "negative campaigns" of politicians. Many people went as far as not voting because of this. Nevertheless, the political scientists noted it is futile to urge candidates to stay positive. The damage from staying positive is heaviest when the opponent is attacking.Explain the dilemma in terms of strategic behavior.
Candidate A | Candidate B | |
Negative campaign | Positive campaign | |
Negative campaign | 10 votes, 10 votes | 15 votes, 6 votes |
Positive campaign | 6 votes, 15 votes | 11votes, 11 votes |
Note: A negative campaign is defined as one where one candidate gives negative information about their opponent in addition to saying positive things about themselves.
A positive campaign is one where one candidate gives only positive things about themselves and does not say anything negative about their opponent.
Criticizing a candidate's position on issues is not negative information, criticizing a person (saying that they have bad character, or they are cheating on their taxes, etc.) is a negative campaign.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started