The word limit for both questions combined is one thousand, five hundred words. ( accreditation will be given to the tutor) - exam practice style question ONLY!

I need to have this structure as follows below, all legislation and cases need to be Australian not the US. I need Harved referencing document is attachment to help. - (reference guide)

• Issue
• Identify the issue
• rule :
• Set out the relevant law
• Application :
• Apply the law to the facts. Say why (or why not) the p's claim are justified
• Conclusion:
• You be the judge. Based on the law, what do you think will be the likely outcome

Part A: 14 marks

Elle runs a Bed & Breakfast house in the Southern Highlands in NSW. To give it a certain quaintness, Elle decides to install outside shutters to frame her windows. Elle orders the pine shutters, which are on sale in the local hardware store. Elle hires a handyman to install the shutters. The instructions are contained in a booklet supplied with the shutters. In very small writing appears the following statement:

These shutters are for decoration only and should not be installed where exposed to harsh weather conditions.

The handyman read this clause but did not say anything to Elle.

After the shutters had been in place for several months, the wood appeared to be splitting. Elle notices that some of the shutters are damaged but does nothing about them.

On a windy evening, one of the damaged shutters is blown from the window surrounds and hits Kimberley, a guest who was in the garden enjoying her one cigarette per day. Another shutter flies off and hits Charles, a member of the public, who is taking a short cut across Elle's property having been caught out too long on a bush walk.

Kimberley suffers bruising and cuts across her arm and shoulder and develops a phobia about wind, claiming she can no longer leave the security of her own home, and cannot work. Charles suffers a head injury and is off work for six months recovering.

Elle immediately removes all the shutters.

Kimberley and Charles have advised that they intend to sue Elle in negligence. Advise Elle on the likelihood of those claims being successful, giving full legal reasons for your response.

Part B: 6 marks

Jacob is interested in buying a small retail clothing business called 'Sport 'n Surf' in Cronulla. One Saturday, Jacob runs into two former school friends, Rose, who owns a hairdressing salon in Cronulla and Geoff, who is a business broker specialising in matching prospective business buyers with sellers in the hotel sector. Jacob tells Rose and Geoff that he is considering buying the business. Rose tells Jacob that Cronulla is booming and that the business is sure to do well, as everyone in Cronulla surfs and plays a sport of some description. Geoff, who is not an accountant, offers to have a look at the books of the business and give Jacob his view. The books of the business have been prepared by Water Accounting Services, the business' usual accountants. Geoff inspects the books and tells Jacob that the business is doing well

and that it made a profit of $120,000 last year. In fact, due to an error by Water Accounting Services, the profit was reported as $120,000 when in fact it was $12,000. Geoff advises Jacob that based on the past profit disclosed in the accounts and his own observations of the business, the purchase price sought by the sellers at $250,000 extremely reasonable.

Jacob bought the business for $250,000 and at the end of twelve months is very disappointed to find that his profit was only $12,000. He learns from other business brokers that a reasonable purchase price for the business, even based on a profit of $120,000 would have been $200,000, but clearly less if based on a profit of $12,000.

Discuss whether Jacob may have been owed a duty of care on the above facts, and if so, by whom. Fully explain your answer.