Theo is running for political office. It is a well$-$known fact that Theo is corrupt$$ he intends to use his office for his own personal and financial gain, to the detriment of the communities he serves. Yet polls show that he has a considerable lead over his opponents because he can afford aggressive advertising. A group of citizens decides to take matters into its own hands by blackmailing Theo so he will drop out of the election.

Most people would agree that this action is immoral. How might it be evaluated by a utilitarian?

Blackmailing Theo is morally wrong because it$$s still possible that he won$$t win the election, or that checks and balances will keep him from having too negative an impact.

Blackmailing Theo is morally right because the communities he serves will ultimately be happier with a leader who is not corrupt.

Blackmailing Theo is morally right because most citizens do not want him as their leader, even if they have fallen for his advertising.

Blackmailing Theo is morally wrong because blackmail is always wrong, even if you don$$t agree with someone$$s values.