There are 3 parts to this paper. Part 1 will ask you to briefly summarize Kerr's (1975) classic article and explain where you've seen this concept in real life. Part 2 will ask you to briefly summarize Yancey's (2010) article about CEO pay, and highlight 2 examples of Kerr's "Rewarding A, while hoping for B" concept being shown in the Yancey article. That is, find and describe at least 2 examples of misaligned incentives that do not actually reward desirable/strategic behaviors in the Yancey article. Explain why these misaligned incentive criteria matter for the organization. For part 3, repeat the process from part 2, only this time with a real organization. You'll either focus on Fannie Mae as your real organization (I've posted a case study on them), OR you'll find and use a news article in which I can clearly follow along with some organization's flawed/misaligned executive pay practices. You'll find and describe 2 examples of misaligned executive incentives in this company, and explain why those misalignments matter for the organization