There are four different aspects of a decision that a business should evaluate in order to maximize profits and be a good corporate citizen. In evaluating the first of the four factors, Grey should determine whether his failure to report the results to the Food and Drug Administration is a violation of select answer . In this case, Grey select answer have a legal duty to perform internal tests on food produced at his plant to check for contamination. Grey select answer have a legal duty to report the initial test results to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Merely complying with the law is known as the select answer In evaluating the second factor, Grey should analyze what the select answer might say if the shipped food caused sickness or death. Knowingly or recklessly allowing someone to become sick from the food because the company continued to test the food until the salmonella test was negative select answer be a public relations problem. In evaluating the third factor, Grey would look at the select answer for consumers and employees. Grey's instructions to repeat the tests until the results were negative, select answer support the health and safety of consumer. To assess the fourth factor, Grey should evaluate how much it might select answer the company to continue to test until the salmonella result is negative. Grey's approach to profits in making this decision seems to be select answer profit maximization. In this case, Grey should consider not just the select answer of testing, but also the select answer of potential lawsuits or settlements. In evaluating the four factors, it seems that Grey's decision was select answer . If Grey had thought through his options as if all food manufacturers would make the same decision, he would be applying select answer . If Grey had analyzed his options using select answer he would have evaluated the costs and benefits of each option to determine the select answer for the select answer and most likely select answer shipped the food. Grey wants to evaluate the outcome for all stakeholders to inform his decision making. Grey first should consider select answer to determine the legal and ethical issues related to implementing a corporate food safety compliance policy. After the initial step, Grey should list his possible actions related to the new law and evaluate each option for select answer Using the information from the first two steps, Grey should work with his staff to come to a consensus and develop a plan of action. Because Grey has used the stakeholder theory to inform his decision making, he has evaluated the protentional outcome for: select answer select answer select answer , as well as select answer There are four different aspects of a decision that a business should evaluate in order to maximize profits and be a good corporate citizen. In evaluating the first of the four factors, Grey should determine whether his failure to report the results to the Food and Drug Administration is a violation of select answer . In this case, Grey select answer have a legal duty to perform internal tests on food produced at his plant to check for contamination. Grey select answer have a legal duty to report the initial test results to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Merely complying with the law is known as the select answer In evaluating the second factor, Grey should analyze what the select answer might say if the shipped food caused sickness or death. Knowingly or recklessly allowing someone to become sick from the food because the company continued to test the food until the salmonella test was negative select answer be a public relations problem. In evaluating the third factor, Grey would look at the select answer for consumers and employees. Grey's instructions to repeat the tests until the results were negative, select answer support the health and safety of consumer. To assess the fourth factor, Grey should evaluate how much it might select answer the company to continue to test until the salmonella result is negative. Grey's approach to profits in making this decision seems to be select answer profit maximization. In this case, Grey should consider not just the select answer of testing, but also the select answer of potential lawsuits or settlements. In evaluating the four factors, it seems that Grey's decision was select answer . If Grey had thought through his options as if all food manufacturers would make the same decision, he would be applying select answer . If Grey had analyzed his options using select answer he would have evaluated the costs and benefits of each option to determine the select answer for the select answer and most likely select answer shipped the food. Grey wants to evaluate the outcome for all stakeholders to inform his decision making. Grey first should consider select answer to determine the legal and ethical issues related to implementing a corporate food safety compliance policy. After the initial step, Grey should list his possible actions related to the new law and evaluate each option for select answer Using the information from the first two steps, Grey should work with his staff to come to a consensus and develop a plan of action. Because Grey has used the stakeholder theory to inform his decision making, he has evaluated the protentional outcome for: select answer select answer select answer , as well as select