there are several circumstances that can "trigger" a state government's right to involuntarily dissolve a corporation headquartered in its state, including: 1) the corporation fails to pay taxes within 60 days of the government-imposed deadline; 2) the corporation fails to submit its annual report to the secretary of state within 60 days of the report's due date; 3) the corporation does not have a registered agent or office in the state for 60 days or more; 4) the corporation fails to notify the secretary of state within 60 days that its registered agent and/or registered office has changed; or 5) the corporation's duration, as specified in its articles of incorporation, has expired. Arguably, many of the described "triggering events" are technicalities, and "inquiring minds" might wonder why a state government would make such a drastic decision to revoke a corporate charter, especially when it would jeopardize the livelihood of corporate employees, as well as future corporate tax payments to the state. The absence of those corporate tax dollars could jeopardize government social programs, which could negatively affect scores of citizens who need access to those programs.

In light of the potential negative impact on the community, how readily should a state government use its involuntary corporate dissolution right?