There are some missing words in picture. I am going to write these right down there:1. In first line there's a name of the person, you can suppose any name.2. Second line: Hotel3. Statte4. Workout5. Incurred.6,7. Treadmill 8. Shattered 9. Because 10 Hotel11. Workout

JREEN STATTE WAS A guest at the Vacation Inn Express, a midpriced, limited service hotel in an urban area. When she checked into the el, she inquired about the availability of a workout room. Upon receiving assurances that the hotel did indeed have such an area, Ms. tte checked into the hotel, put away her luggage, changed into workout attire, and proceeded to the workout area. Upon entering the kout room, she noticed a sign prominently posted near the entrance to the workout room stating: "Hotel Not Liable for Any Injuries urred During Workouts." According to her attorney, Ms. Statte lifted deadweights for approximately 10 minutes, and then mounted a admill. As an experienced treadmill user, she started slowly, gradually increasing the treadmill's speed. Shortly after beginning the admill workout, Ms. Statte fell backward into a plate-glass window that was approximately 2 feet behind the treadmill. The glass ttered, and shards from the glass severely injured Ms. Statte. Ms. Statte's attorney claimed the accident was the fault of the hotel cause the treadmill was too close to the window, and the hotel neglected to outfit the windows with safety glass. As its defense, the tel pointed out the presence of the exculpatory clause sign, clearly posted, that Ms. Statte agreed she had read prior to beginning her rkout. Do you believe a guest who has agreed to be responsible for her own injuries during a workout has also agreed to be responsible for them in presence of significant negligence on the part of the hotel? As the hotel manager, how might you resolve this dispute? Discuss Could a lawsuit have been prevented? Discuss