Question
There is a hot debate in the literature about the consequences of different ways of financing the government expenditure. Let suppose you are an Economic
There is a hot debate in the literature about the consequences of different ways of
financing the government expenditure. Let suppose you are an Economic Advisor of
Prime Minister of Pakistan. Keeping in view the debate in the literature, what factors
would you suggest to the Prime Minister to consider/keep in mind to finance a given
government expenditure. Explain.
B. Baluchistan is the most underprivileged province of Pakistan. The Federal Government
wants to improve the welfare of the residents of the province by providing better health
services. Which of the following grants should the government use to achieve the
objective and why?
i. Lump sum/unconditional grant
ii. Matching grants
Graphically explain your point of view.
C. Consider a mineral that is in fixed supply, Q
S = 4. The demand for the mineral is given
by Q
D = 10 - 2P, where P is the price per Kg and Q
D
is the quantity demanded. The
government imposes a tax of $2 per Kg. on the mineral.
i. What is the price paid by the consumer before the tax is imposed, and in the post-
tax equilibrium?
ii. What is the price received by producers before and after tax?
iii. How much revenue is raised?
iv. Is there any dead weight loss of this tax? If yes, what is it?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started