There was a large unmarked sinkhole on Charlotte's property, a short distance from a public road. One evening, a police officer chased a mugger off the road and onto Charlotte's property. Both the officer and the mugger fell into the hole and were injured. Which one of the following best answers whether Charlotte is liable for the injuries to the police officer and/or to the mugger? Select one: A. Charlotte is liable to the officer for the unguarded ditch, because the officer was a licensee, but she is not liable to the trespassing mugger. B. Charlotte is not liable to the officer or the mugger, because they were both trespassers on her property. C. Charlotte is not liable to either the officer or the mugger, because occupiers of land have no duty to correct defects abutting sidewalks or streets. D. Charlotte is liable to both the officer and the mugger, because she had a duty to avoid endangering travelers with an unguarded ditch