These questions are based off the Lucy v. Zehmer case.

1. The Supreme Court of Virginia ruled there was a contract between the parties and reversed the trial court.What was the reasoning of the court in deciding this case?What did the appellate court believe the big issue was?
2. Mr. Lucy was suing for specific performance of the contract. What does specific performance of a contract mean? What did the buyer, Mr. Lucy, really want when the case was over?