Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

This assessment addresses the following course objective(s): Interpret Common Law, reasoning and the doctrine of Judicial Precedent Explain the different rules of Statutory Interpretation Describe

This assessment addresses the following course objective(s): Interpret Common Law, reasoning and the doctrine of Judicial Precedent Explain the different rules of Statutory Interpretation Describe the structure and functions of the Commonwealth Caribbean Court System

Scenario: On the afternoon of October 30th, Robert Bloom from Bloom's Waste Management went on a work site and collected a truckload of contaminated soil from excavations at a building site in Arima. Robert drove the full truck back to his company's yard in Port of Spain late that evening and left the truck parked there overnight. His intention was to drive the truck to a remote site the next morning. Peter Smith, a municipal inspector saw the truck in the yard and upon inspection discovered that the soil in the truck was contaminated by toxic waste. Mr. Smith contacted Robert and informed him he was in violation of Section 3 of the Contamination Avoidance Act which forbids him from storing such near a river or riverbed without a special permit. Robert admits that the soil is contaminated and told Mr. Smith he cannot produce a permit. The Coroni River is three kilometres from the Bloom's Waste Management company's yard. The inspector makes a report to the Police, who charged Robert with a breach of Section 3 of the Contamination Avoidance Act which states: A person shall not store or permit the storage of toxic materials within five kilometers of a river or riverbed without first obtaining a permit from the Minister. The objective of the Act is to: (1) protect the water resources or Trinidad and Tobago; and (2) to prevent harm caused by the accidental spread of contaminants. Robert is given the option of admitting guilt and paying a fine of $1,000; otherwise, he will have to defend the charge in court. Robert asked for your advice. He admits the soil was left in the yard, but says it was only left there overnight and that he always intended to move it the next day. He says that, in these circumstances, he does not think he contravened the Act. Advise Robert as to whether he should pay the $1,000 fine or defend the charge in court. Instructions: As a group you will analyse the situation and inform Robert whether he was in contravention of Section 3 of the Contamination Avoidance Act. Your assignment should be submitted using the IRAC method of legal analysis. The group assignment should be supported with at least four legal sources.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Criminal Law Cases And Materials

Authors: Joshua Dressler, Stephen Garvey

9th Edition

1647087708, 978-1647087708

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

How is radio propagation on land different from that in free space?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Describe the parts of the self, according to William James.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

2. To store it and

Answered: 1 week ago