Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

THIS CASE AND EXPLAIN WHY. ( DISCUSSIONS) Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1857 The Constitution does not consider slaves to be U.S. citizens. Rather, they are

THIS CASE AND EXPLAIN WHY. ( DISCUSSIONS)

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1857"

The Constitution does not consider slaves to be U.S. citizens. Rather, they are constitutionally protected property of their masters."

Chief Justice Roger Taney authored this opinion one of the most important and scorned in the nation's history.

Dred Scott, a slave, had moved with his master to Illinois, a free state. He moved again to a slave state, Missouri, and filed suit to gain freedom, under that state's law of "Once free, always free." Taney held that Scott had never been free at all, and cited Constitutional grounds for placing the slavery decision in the hands of the states. In trying to put an end to the slavery controversy, Taney instead sped the nation toward civil war. The decision was later overturned by the Thirteenth Amendment.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Law Of Contract

Authors: Paul Richards

14th Edition

1292251484, 978-1292251486

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Annoyance about a statement that has been made by somebody

Answered: 1 week ago