This is a business ethics question but there is no subject for it

I need this back later on

Do you believe that Valjean acted morally even though he broke the law by stealing the bread. Why or why not?

Under what conditions do you believe it is moral to break a law? Be as specific as you can. Then provide one example that meets your proposed conditions (that is, where it is moral to break the law in question) and a second example that does not (that is, where it is not moral to break the law in question).

Les Misrables You may have seen the very popular Broadway show or movie Les Misrables, based on Victor Hugo's epic nineteenth-century French novel of the same name. The main character, Jean Valjean, steals a loaf of bread to feed his sister's starving family and is arrested and sent to prison. If we apply conventional reasoning and principles of law to his crime, Valjean genuinely is guilty as charged and we do not need to consider any extenuating circumstances. However, in a Kantian ethical framework, we would take into account Valjean's motives as well as his duty to treat his sister's family as ends in themselves who deserve to live. Valjean's fate demonstrates what might occur when there is a gap between the legal and the moral. Clearly, Valjean broke the law by stealing the bread. However, he acted morally by correcting a wrong and possibly saving human lives. According to Kantian ethics, Valjean may have been ethical in stealing bread for his family, particularly because the action was grounded in good will and provided benefit to others more than to himself