This is a classic tort case, decided when the tort law was evolving by one of the most admired jurists, Judge Cardozo. The case centers on "causation". Analyze this case in terms of causation. Do you agree with the outcome? Support your conclusion with legal analysis.Do not just look up the case and tell me what the court decided, give me YOUR conclusion based on YOUR analysis.You will need to post before you can see the replies of others.

http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/archives/palsgraf_lirr.htm