This is a power point presentation I need a draft by Wednesday evening and the final product by Friday night. This is Graduate level, please be sure you can help accordingly.

TAX 665 Final Project Part II Guidelines and Rubric Overview The second final project for this course is the creation of a PowerPoint presentation. Everyday economic events can have significant estate and gift tax consequences. Being able to spot estate and gift tax issues and communicate effectively with clients is essential for any high-level financial professional working in a privately held enterprise or advising high-net-worth individuals. Professional accountant working in a bank, consulting firm, or financial services firm are often responsible for advising clients on tax implications of their financial investment decisions, including estate and gift taxation as it is currently applied in the United States and around the world. In this project, you will model the role of an associate in a boutique tax consulting firm that specializes in the real estate industry. You will demonstrate your ability to advise clients on estate and gift taxation, life insurance, annuity, and charitable giving strategies, and make ethically sound and socially responsible decisions by creating a PowerPoint presentation for your client. In this assignment you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes: Assess the potential gift or estate tax liability in relation to the annual exclusion, gift tax deductions, marital deduction, and unified credit, as provided for by the Internal Revenue Code, while meeting the client's desired economic outcomes Analyze various forms of property for potential estate and gift tax consequences of these forms of ownership, as provided for by the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations, and case law, and their impact on the client's economic outcomes Evaluate the risk of noncompliance with AICPA, IRS Circular 230, and the penalty provisions of the Internal Revenue Code in light of possible stakeholder misconduct, using moral reasoning to advise the client Recommend strategies that reflect versatility of thought, for achieving favorable estate and gift tax consequences of wealth transfers, by reducing tax liability in order to meet the client's desired economic outcomes Evaluate the influence of an estate and gift tax planning strategy on the effectiveness of the overall tax strategy, including income tax, and its potential to result in ethically sound outcomes and optimum desired results for the client Prompt You are an associate in a boutique tax consulting firm that specializes in the real estate industry. You have been assigned to work with a client who needs advice on the tax implications of his business holdings, which include Skyscrapers, a commercial real estate firm organized as a sole proprietorship with a fair market value of $1 billion. He is considering transferring partial ownership of the Skyscrapers to both of his children and selling a 10% interest to an unrelated third party. You have already prepared a memorandum informing management of the estate and gift tax consequences of these potential transactions and including a costbenefit analysis. Now, you need to prepare a PowerPoint presentation that communicates your tax planning strategy, which you will present to the client and his financial advisors. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Introduction A. Describe the estate and gift tax strategy to the client in layman's terms. Concentrate on the creative aspects of the strategy that minimize the client's tax liability over time. B. Explain how family limited partnerships (FLPs) and intentionally defective grantor trusts (IDGTs) help to accomplish the client's desired economic results. Consider the jargon and mechanics of the transaction when preparing the presentation. C. Justify how your strategy will minimize income tax liability on the sale of the partial interest in the business to an unrelated third party and on the taxable income potentially received by the business's operations over the next 24 months. Consider including comparisons to alternative transaction structures in the justification. II. Tax Planning Strategy A. Recommend life insurance, annuities, and charitable giving strategies to the client, taking into account anticipated business needs and cash flow. B. Summarize, using layman's terms, how the taxpayer's overall cash flow and liquidity concerns were taken into account when designing the proposed strategy. Consider current gift tax expenditures. C. Explain the 30-year projections in layman's terms, assuming 3% annual appreciation in the value of the assets of the business, using the proposed estate tax strategy. Consider the gift and estate tax liability the client will ultimately pay. D. Formulate the potential lifetime estate tax savings and tax liabilities over 30 years under the proposed strategy and without the proposed strategy. Consider IRS Code and Regulations. E. Analyze long-term income tax considerations by comparing the total income tax liability with no tax strategy against the liability applying your proposed estate tax planning strategy. III. Risk Analysis: Analyze penalties, interest, and ethical considerations that might impact the client using the following scenarios. Keep layman's terms in mind as you word the results of your analysis supported by appropriate IRS Code and Regulations. A. The client did not have enough cash on hand to fund gift tax or income tax incurred from the estate planning. B. The client encouraged his friend to prepare an inaccurate appraisal. Final Project Part II Rubric Guidelines for Submission: PowerPoint presentation including the speaker notes feature for additional appropriate information. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions. Critical Elements Introduction: Describe Exemplary (100%) Meets \"Proficient\" criteria and details creatively minimize the client's tax liability over time Proficient (90%) Describes an estate and gift tax strategy that is effective over time using layman's terms Introduction: Explain Meets \"Proficient\" criteria and details provide exceptional ability to clarify the jargon and mechanics of the transaction Meets \"Proficient\" criteria and illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed income tax strategy in comparison to alternative transaction structures Meets \"Proficient\" criteria and strategies show creative approaches that address the client's anticipated financial needs Explains how FLPs and IDGTs help to accomplish the client's desired economic outcomes Introduction: Justify Strategy: Recommend Strategy: Summarize Meets \"Proficient\" criteria and details accurately and comprehensively show how the proposed strategy maximizes future estate tax strategy while being efficient with current gift tax expenditures Justifies how the proposed strategy will minimize income tax liability over the next 24 months based on relevant income tax consequences Recommends strategies involving life insurance, annuities, and charitable giving that comprehensively address the client's anticipated financial needs Summarizes, using layman's terms, how the client's overall cash flow and liquidity concerns were taken into account when designing the proposed strategy Needs Improvement (70%) Describes an estate and gift tax strategy, but details either do not show how the strategy is effective over time or are not in layman's terms Explains how FLPs and IDGTs help to accomplish the client's desired economic outcome, but details are unclear or cursory Justifies how the proposed strategy will minimize income tax liability, but details lack relevance Not Evident (0%) Does not describe an estate and gift tax strategy Value 9 Does not explain how FLPs and IDGTs help to accomplish the client's desired economic outcomes Does not justify how the proposed strategy will minimize income tax liability 9 Recommends strategies that address the client's anticipated financial needs, but details are cursory Does not recommend strategies that address the client's anticipated financial needs 9 Summarizes how the overall cash flow and liquidity concerns were taken into account when designing the proposed strategy, but details are either unclear or cursory Does not summarize how the overall cash flow and liquidity concerns were taken into account when designing the proposed strategy 9 9 Strategy: Explain Meets \"Proficient\" criteria and includes the 30-year projected gift and state tax liability the client will pay Explains in layman's terms the 30-year projections, assuming the 3% annual appreciation, using the proposed strategy Strategy: Formulate Meets \"Proficient\" criteria and details are comprehensive and accurately cite IRS Code and Regulations Strategy: Analyze Meets \"Proficient\" criteria and details justify how the proposed strategy addresses income tax in comparison to no estate and gift strategy being pursued Risk Analysis Meets \"Proficient\" criteria and details accurately and clearly communicate results that are supported by appropriate IRS Code and Regulations Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Formulates potential lifetime estate tax savings under proposed strategy and compares both tax liabilities assuming no strategy was used versus applying the proposed strategy Analyzes long-term income tax considerations by comparing the total income tax liability with no tax strategy versus the liability applying the proposed strategy Analyzes potential penalty, interest, and ethical considerations, addressed in both scenarios, that might impact the client Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Articulation of Response Explains in layman's terms the 30-year projections, assuming the 3% annual appreciation, but details are either unclear or cursory Formulates potential lifetime estate tax savings under proposed strategy, but details either do not compare both tax liabilities with and without the strategy or are cursory Does not explain the 30-year projections 9 Does not formulate potential lifetime tax savings 9 Analyzes long-term income tax considerations, but details either do not compare the total income tax liability with and without the proposed strategy or are cursory Analyzes potential penalty, interest, and ethical considerations that might impact the client, but details are inaccurate or incomplete Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Does not analyze long-term tax considerations 9 Does not analyze potential penalty, interest, and ethical considerations addressed in both scenarios 18 Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%