This is the question:

How do I analyze the concept of offer under the Malaysian law and provide significance towards an enforceable legal binding contract? In reference to the above judgment, what are the objective test that has been applied to mitigate a valid offer and acceptance in the context of doctrine of promissory estoppels?

I do know how to start the essay, with the concepts on offer and acceptance, however i am not sure on how to provide solid explanations on the significance of offer and acceptance towards an enforceable legal binding contract. Besides, i do not understand the question "what are the objective test that has been applied to mitigate a valid offer and acceptance in the context of doctrine of promissory estoppels?" I can't seem to find proper references as well.

Please help me to understand the question. thank you so much for the help.